Save the Date!

www.emiconference.com

This talk will explore the critical intersection of war rhetoric and the state of exception in Ecuador. This topic unveils how language and legal frameworks shape political authority and societal responses in times of crisis. War rhetoric, often employed to evoke urgency and solidarity, has been a recurring tool in Ecuadorian political discourse, especially in addressing issues such as organized crime, drug trafficking, and social unrest. This rhetoric frames these challenges as existential threats, demanding extraordinary measures to safeguard national security and public order. Such discourse justifies and amplifies the use of states of exception, a constitutional mechanism that temporarily suspends certain human rights to empower the state to act decisively. However, the state of exception has also been used to expedite the discussion of tax statutes in the legislative and to evade the independent control of public expense in defense. This raises critical questions about the balance between state authority and constitutional limits and the potential for abuse under the guise of emergency powers.

In Ecuador, the deployment of war rhetoric has become increasingly evident in recent years, particularly as the government confronts escalating violence and organized crime. While these measures may be very popular in certain sectors of society, they also normalize authoritarian practices and undermine democratic institutions. This lecture will examine war as a legal category, the facts that were used to justify the application of the state of exception, the response of the judicial institutions, and the response of a significant portion of the society that decides to ignore legal institutions to support the establishment of an authoritarian regimen. Ultimately, we will reflect on the delicate balance between addressing genuine threats and preserving the constitutional guarantees that underpin a democratic society.

David Cordero-Heredia, J.S.D. ’18 is a Law Professor of Law at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador currently affiliated to Cornell University as Visiting Fellow of the Latin American and Caribbean Studies Program. He has been a visiting professor at the Andean University Simón Bolívar (UASB), the University of the Americas (UDLA), and the University of Azuay (UDA). From 2018 to 2019, he co-taught the International Human Rights Clinic: Policy Advocacy at Cornell Law School as a Senior Teaching Postdoctoral Fellow. His research work deals with the interaction of social movements and the legal field with a focus on indigenous peoples.

In this event, we will be officially launching the archive Todosomos, a collection of handwritten testimonies by Venezuelan migrants who crossed the border from Venezuela to Colombia between 2019 and 2021. The event will have several panels and include interventions by the founders of Todosomos, the library team in charge of the processing and transcription of the archive, Venezuelan artists and writers, a representative of the NGO Ithaca Welcomes Refugees, and a talk by Professor Zeb Tortorici (NYU). It will also include a lunch, a reception, and a pop-up exhibit of the handwritten notebooks. This event is free and open to the public.

View the event program

The recent U.S. election is likely to have significant impacts on immigration policy and practices. Based on experience with the previous Trump administration and standing efforts among Republicans in Congress, these changes may impact Cornell students, staff, and faculty. Join Cornell’s Migrations Program in a conversation about the current state of immigration policy.

This is a virtual-only meeting open to Cornell faculty, staff, and students. Registration is required.

Panelists

Shannon Gleeson, School of Industrial and Labor Relations and Brooks School of Public PolicyLaura Taylor, Director of International ServicesStephen Yale-Loehr, Cornell Law SchoolModerator

Wendy Wolford, Vice Provost for International Affairs and Robert A. and Ruth E. Polson Professor of Global Development in the College of Agriculture and Life SciencesHost and Sponsors

The Migrations Program, part of the Mario Einaudi Center for International Studies, builds upon the work of Migrations: A Global Grand Challenge to inform real-world policies and outcomes for populations that migrate.

Regions of the world are historical constructions yet over time they have seemed to become more and more fixed. This talk will cut across linguistic and cultural boundaries and re-examine conceptualizations of regions in the Americas and the wider Atlantic World, showing evidence for a very polyglot, cross-imperial and interconnected Greater Southern Caribbean during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. The second half of the eighteenth century saw the growth of the Windward Islands, the southern Dutch Antilles and the southern rimland. These developments, together with the continued importance of well-established Barbados, make it possible to conceive of a new zone of interaction, encompassing Venezuela and its offshore islands, the Guianas, Trinidad and Tobago, and the Lesser Antillean chain from Dominica to the Grenadines. Historians continue to reconsider the boundaries of the Caribbean, resulting in a shifting understanding of traditional regions in the Americas. They now increasingly focus on the relationships between the islands and territories of North, Central and South America that touch the Caribbean Sea.

This talk will explore the strong connections from most of the Lesser Antilles to the Spanish mainland and the Guianas. Furthermore, it will claim that the Southern Caribbean had special importance in the context of the Atlantic World since it helped to connect the North and South Atlantic. Southern Caribbean colonies were a source of news about events on the South American continent especially during the Spanish American War of Independence. Economic, political, scientific, and even missionary networks also consolidated across the sub-region and helped to forge new bonds across the North and South Atlantic. Ultimately, the Revolutionary Greater Southern Caribbean provides a good case to reconsider how regions are constructed and how they change over time.

Dexnell Peters is currently Lecturer in Caribbean and Atlantic History at the University of the West Indies, Mona campus. He was previously a Teaching Fellow at the University of Warwick and Supernumerary Fellow and Bennett Boskey Fellow in Atlantic History at Exeter College, University of Oxford. Dexnell has a PhD in Atlantic History from Johns Hopkins University. He is broadly interested in the history of the Greater Caribbean and the Atlantic World. Dexnell's current research project, through the main themes of geography and the environment, inter-imperial transitions, migration, the plantation economy, politics and religion, makes a case for the rise of a Greater Southern Caribbean region (inclusive of Venezuela and the Guianas) in the late eighteenth century, showing evidence for a very polyglot, cross-imperial and interconnected world. His first book, written in collaboration with historian Shane Pantin at the University of the West Indies (UWI) St. Augustine, focused on the history of the campus’ Guild of Students in commemoration of the organization’s fiftieth anniversary and covered key issues of student movements, decolonization and post-independence in the former British Caribbean colony of Trinidad & Tobago.

The global history of the interrelationship between race, migration, and real estate is still in its infancy, even as it promises a particularly rewarding angle on histories of how mobility and inequality have been intertwined. The Argentine capital of Buenos Aires, which during the second half of the nineteenth century received large numbers of European immigrants and underwent spectacular urban transformations, offers a window onto these problems. In recent decades, historians have increasingly viewed this migration through the lens of Argentine elites’ discourses of “whitening,” but they have rarely examined the concrete urban effects that European immigration had for the city’s Afro-descendants, who in the 1830s still constituted more than a quarter of the population. This talk attempts to do as much by looking at the formation of a Black neighborhood through real estate acquisition as well as the ensuing process of dispossession. While the empirical focus is micro-historical, the explanatory horizon is broader: The paper ultimately seeks to derive more general findings about the history of capitalism and inequality in the nineteenth-century Atlantic.

Michael Goebel is the Einstein Professor of Global History at Freie Universität Berlin and co-director of the university’s Center for French Studies. Since his Ph.D. (University College London, 2006) he has also worked at the European University Institute, Harvard University, and the Geneva Graduate Institute. Following his 2015 book Anti-Imperial Metropolis, which won the Jerry Bentley Prize in World History, he has increasingly grown interested in the emerging field of global urban history. He is currently the Principal Investigator of the SNSF-funded project Patchwork Cities, which explores the history of segregation in port cities in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

On Monday, April 9, Michael Goebel will be giving another lecture, "Contagion, Inevitability, and Teleology: Imperial Disintegration and Nation-State Formation in Global History."

Co-Sponsored by the Department of Government, Department of History, Institute for Comparative Modernities, and Institute for European Studies.

Historians have long been interested in the questions of how and why multinational empires gave way to nation-states. As revisionist scholars of various empires have lamented during the last few decades, post- imperial nationalist historiographies all too frequently construed the transition from empire to nation-state as a natural process governed by universal laws of awakening nationhood. But in light of the nation-state’s recurring seriality, the revisionist emphasis of each case’s inherent capriciousness creates new interpretive problems—in particular as we zoom out to a more global purview. In evaluating key terms in the global historiography about imperial disintegration and nation-state formation, such as contagion, inevitability, and teleology, this talk challenges revisionist accounts and argues that gestures to “contingency” are ill-suited to the purpose of explaining the global spread of the nation-state form during the last 250 years of world history. The talk ultimately points specifically to the centrality of popular sovereignty as a vehicle for the proliferation of nominal nation-states in the modern world.

Michael Goebel is the Einstein Professor of Global History at Freie Universität Berlin and co-director of the university’s Center for French Studies. Since his Ph.D. (University College London, 2006) he has also worked at the European University Institute, Harvard University, and the Geneva Graduate Institute. Following his 2015 book Anti-Imperial Metropolis, which won the Jerry Bentley Prize in World History, he has increasingly grown interested in the emerging field of global urban history. He is currently the Principal Investigator of the SNSF-funded project Patchwork Cities, which explores the history of segregation in port cities in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

On Tuesday, April 8, Michael Goebel will be giving another lecture, Black Monserrat: Race, Migration, and Real Estate in Nineteenth-Century Buenos Aires as part of the Latin American and Caribbean Studies Seminar Series.

Co-Sponsored by the Department of Government, Department of History, Institute for Comparative Modernities, and Institute for European Studies.

Since the end of the 17th century, English and French navigators increased their presence throughout the Pacific to connect existing Atlantic trade with Asia. Their navigations through the Pacific familiarized them with advantageous sites—such as in Tierra de Fuego—which functioned as stopovers. These new navigations posed a significant threat to Spain’s attempts to control maritime commerce between the Pacific and Atlantic oceans that passed through American waters. Spain’s need to diversify its maritime routes became clearer still after the Seven Years’ War and the English capture of La Havana and Manila. As a response, peninsular authorities considered extending Spain’s maritime presence in the Pacific by better using isthmus areas like Tehuantepec and Nicaragua. This presentation aims to explain how Spain’s new maritime projects reconsidered the geostrategic position of the isthmus as a crossable point between the Atlantic and the Pacific. In the case of Tehuantepec, the new projects were related to the Maritime Department of San Blas and Spanish expansion into the Northwest of America; in the case of Nicaragua, however, the projects focused on proposals to better connect with Asian trade. These cases let us think about the different particularities that exist in the maritime projects show how Spanish geostrategic considerations for the isthmuses of Tehuantepec and Nicaragua stressed the plurality of imperial visions exerted by late Bourbon officials.

On Monday, March 3, Dr. Pinzón will also be participating in a Spanish-language conversaiton with Dr. Ernesto Bassi, titled "Maritime History from Latin American Shores."

Guadalupe Pinzón Ríos is a Doctor in History from the Faculty of Philosophy and Letters of the UNAM, where she is currently a researcher and professor at the Institute for Historical Research. Pinzón Ríos is also a member of the National System of Researchers and an advisor of the graduate program in history. She has been studying maritime port activities throughout the Pacific, especially in New Spain, and has published Acciones y reacciones en los puertos del Mar del Sur. Desarrollo portuario del Pacífico novohispano a partir de sus políticas defensivas (1713-1789) and Hombres de mar en las costas novohispanas. Trabajos, trabajadores y vida portuaria en el departamento marítimo de San Blas (siglo XVIII). She also has various published works, articles, and book chapters.

Co-sponsored by Romance Studies, Science & Technology Studies, , and Society for the Humanities.

Latin America and the Caribbean: Connection, Integration, and Negotiation

LACS invites Cornell faculty, staff, graduate, and undergraduate students to participate in its Annual Research Symposium on February 21 and 22, 2025. This symposium aims to be a vibrant community-building space, fostering collaboration and dialogue among scholars, researchers, and practitioners from diverse disciplines and backgrounds. By bringing together Latinamericanist and Caribbeanist voices, the event will create opportunities for meaningful exchange, networking, and the co-creation of ideas. Through panel discussions and informal gatherings, participants can build lasting connections, form interdisciplinary partnerships, and contribute to a shared vision of regional integration and cooperation.

América Latina y el Caribe: Conexión, Integración y Negociación

LACS invita a la comunidad de Cornell a participar en su simposio de investigación anual a llevarse a cabo los días 21 y 22 de febrero de 2025. Este simposio tiene como propósito ofrecer un espacio comunitario que promoverá la colaboración y el diálogo entre académicos, investigadores y profesionales de diversas disciplinas y formaciones. Al unir voces latinoamericanistas y caribeñistas, el evento creará oportunidades para el intercambio, el networking y la co-creación de ideas. A través de discusiones de paneles y encuentros informales, los participantes podrán construir conexiones duraderas, formar colaboraciones interdisciplinarias y contribuir a una visión compartida de integración y cooperación regional.

Friday, February 21

5:00-5:15 Welcome, Ernesto Bassi Arevalo, Director of LACS

5:15-6:30 - Panel 1. Historicizing the Caribbean; Moderator: Harry Churchill

Carmine Couloute, “Haiti’s Two-Tiered Citizenship”Karina Beras, “Incendiary Instances, Extrinsic Energies”Jean-Michel Mutore, “The Discourse of Slavery Abolition on San Andrés and Old Providence, 1842-1873”Kaori Quan, “What Père Duchesne Saw in Saint-Domingue: Watching the Haitian Revolution from Afar”6:30-8:30 - Reception

Saturday, February 22

9:00-9:30 - Breakfast

9:30-10:45 - Panel 2. Bodies of Water; Moderator: Isabel Padilla

J. Rafael Ponciano, “Concerning Space and Atmosphere: Disaffected Kinship in Salón de belleza by Mario Bellatin”Michael Cary, “Engineering the Wetlands: Power, Infrastructure, and Agrarian Change in Ñeembucú, Paraguay”Jack Brown, “Do Dead Fish Like Merengue? Popular Music and Climate Change in the Caribbean”Maoz Bizan, “The Uruguayan Hydropower Network under Drought” 10:45-12:00 - Panel 3. Democracy and Representation; Moderator: Rocío Salas-Lewin

Emma MacCallum, “How Penal Populists Erode Democratic Norms: Legitimization of Undemocratic Anti-Crime Policies”Delphi Lyra, “The Effects of Top Down Polarization: The PT Party and Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil”Vivian Yellen, "Governing ‘White Gold’ during a ‘Pink Tide’: The Political Economy of Chile’s National Lithium Strategy" 12:00-1:00 - Lunch

1:00-2:15 - Panel 4. Transformations; Moderator: Jack Brown

Diego Cepeda, "Agency of the Unknown: Porous Subjectivity in Elaine Vilar Madruga's El cielo de la selva"Paulo Lorca, “Revisiting the Aesthetic Machine”Vanessa Sandoval, “Bugs, Bias, and Colonialism: Decolonizing Entomophagy in Mexico”Daniel Rosa Hunter, “Bored Writing: Crossings of Virtuality and Fiction in Teresa de la Parra’s Ifigenia (1924)” 2:15-3:30 - Panel 5. Global Mobilities and Governance; Moderator: Marcos Pérez Cañizares

Gorka Villar Vázquez, “The visit to Italy of Chilean communist leader Luis Corvalán (1977). An episode of the ideological tensions of the International Communist Movement in the West”Rocío Salas-Lewin, “Behavioral Responses to the Crisis of Representation: Voice and Exit in Chile and Spain”Dayra Lascano, “Bias or Bond? Alignment and Its Influence on Regional International Organizations”Tianran Chen, “Beyond “Saving” Life: Biopolitical Dynamics and Virus Narrative in Saving the World”3:30-3:45 - Coffee break

3:45-5:00 - Panel 6. Communities and Agency; Moderator: Leonardo Santamaría Montero

Alonso Alegre-Bravo, “Power to the People: Seeking Fair Electricity Access Indicators in Guatemala”Stephanie López, “Reframing Local Archives and Community Organizing in Medellín, Colombia”Brume Dezembro Iazzetti, “Travestis will save Brazil!”: Intersectionality, political history, and the gender/national identityCarolina Osorio Gil, “Semillas de Resistencia / Seeds of Resistance: Building a Medicinal Plants Project with a Campesina/o Resistance Movement in Antioquia, Colombia”Amanda Vilchez and Edwin Eddy Johan Machaca Condori, “Beyond Language: Collaborative Translation and the Recovery of Traditions”